|
|||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why Small Businesses Usually Under-Perform |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To see why the majority of small businesses under-perform, it may
be helpful first to look at the factors at play when large companies
under-perform.
In the 1980's the Board of AWA, a large diversified electronics and trading company, found that their executive staff (the people they paid to run the company on a day-to-day basis) had gone close to bankrupting their company through injudicious (the executive said "unlucky") foreign currency trades. The Board sued the Company's Auditors for not alerting them to their exposure in a timely fashion - and the Auditors countersued the Board for negligence in the performance of their duties in acquitting their directorial responsibilities. Justice Rogers, Chief Justice of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of NSW in hearing the case found himself faced with an unexpected challenge; he found there were very few guidelines available to the Court - or to Boards - as to just what their duties were, and that those guidelines that did exist were often contradictory or unclear! J Rogers' observations on the AWA case lead to Professor Fred Hilmer chairing an Independent Working Party into Corporate Governance to clarify the relative roles and responsibilities of those who direct Companies, and those who run them. I found the working party's report (outlined in a small, rather dry little book, cutely titled "Strictly Boardroom") made a lot of sense to me when looking at the challenges faced by our corporate clients but I think what started me seeing the parallels between the big and the small end of town was Hilmer's focus on the generally poor performance of many large public companies in generating profits for their shareholders. Putting together the fact that ATO figures show the average SMB owner makes around 4-5% net profit and the fact that a significant percentage of our Business Analyses show similar or worse figures prior to our starting work with clients, the penny dropped for me that some of Prof Hilmer's observations are as relevant for our small and medium business (SMB) clients as they are for public companies, and so I'm taking the opportunity to share them with you here, along with a few observations of my own. To begin with, many of our SMB Clients wear both hats of being the Director and the Manager of their business. So the person under the Director's hat, who is responsible for setting the goals for the enterprise and enforcing performance relative to attaining those goals, is the same person who, when wearing the Manager's hat, is mired in the day-to-day running of the business. As Manager he understands all the reasons and excuses for his own under-performance, distraction and loss of direction that are responsible for failing to achieve the Director's goals. How do you "fix" this apparently irresolvable challenge? Fairly simply, in fact: Separate your roles as Director of your Company (or business) and as Manager of its day-to-day running, and allocate specific times - and quarantined "head space" - to fulfilling these complementary yet antagonistic roles. So let's take a look at how the good Professor's recommendations might shape up when applied to carrying out your Directorial duties in your own business: Duty 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complementary Yet Separate Roles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you fulfil the roles of both Director and Manager it helps to be
mindful of which hat you are wearing and when; it helps to make sure
that you wear each in turn to an appropriate degree, and it helps
to be clear on which duties go with what hat.
As the Director, your tasks are to:
As the Manager, your tasks are to:
And that, as they say, is where I come in! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Putting a Coach on Your Board? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have a theory that as a business owner becomes more performance
aware, the business coach will become their ideal "ex-officio board
member" - a "director" in role only, who is not involved in corporate
politics; whose only agenda is to facilitate their client's agenda;
who brings a broad range of experience to the table; who is a trained
professional in setting goals and enforcing performance; and who can
be terminated without a vote or fuss!
So, if your "Manager" is not achieving the goals that your "Director" (and/or Shareholder) wants, it may be time to beef up your Board with a new Director - one who will help you set clear, concise and realistic goals; one who will coach you to lift your performance; one who will hold you accountable for achieving your goals - and one who will even suggest that you occasionally reward yourself for a job well done! Is it time for you to talk
to a Coach - and to join the ranks of the high performers? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Chilly Future - How Much Do You Need To Be Financially Free? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has been interesting to watch the growing awareness about self
managed superannuation funds among business owners, and I now find
myself doing more crystal ball gazing than ever before with clients
when it comes to estimating the amount of invested capital they will
require to provide their desired level of passive income and become
financially free, in an ever-shifting environment.
The ProfiTune team is sometimes criticised for being too conservative when it comes to estimating returns on capital and the taxation of investment income. For example, we usually base our estimates of "required invested capital" on a net return of just 6%, in an inflationary regime of 4% - and we calculate 30% tax on earnings. In the light of current Reserve Bank rumblings, our inflation safety factor is looking increasingly prudent. When you look at the impact of war and terrorism on oil and other resource prices, our estimated net return on capital is also looking increasingly prudent. But we are still taken to task over allowing for 30% taxation on earnings - especially since 1 July 2006, when income drawn by 60 year olds from their superannuation funds was made tax free. The critics may be right - but for how long? I experienced one of those chilling moments last week - you know the ones when you glimpse a future threat, and all the tiny hairs of the back of your neck stand up to warn you? I was reading a review of Peter Costello's recent performance as Treasurer, when my focus tunnelled in on the following: "In his 2002 Intergenerational Report, Mr Costello rightly highlighted the need to lift productivity and workforce participation in order to provide the tax base to fund future pensions - but by allowing retirees to pay no tax, he will add vastly to the future budgetary burden of those still in the workforce - and they will have to pay more tax - or we will have to switch to deficit financing, or we will have to return to a regime of taxing superannuation!" If you would like to know our answer to just how much it would be smart for you to budget on needing to support your chosen lifestyle, click here to find out "How Much You Need To Be Financially Free". By the way, if we are wrong, and you end up with 30% more income than you counted on, will you be complaining to me? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book Review - Building a Values-Driven Organization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Each month I ask Sue Sharpe from Phoenix Rising Bookshop to share her insights into "wot's hot" in the field of business writing, and Sue has come good again this month with: "Building a Values-Driven Organization" Richard Barrett begins his introduction to this book by stating that his purpose is to develop and build on the ideas contained in Liberating the Corporate Soul: Building a Visionary Organization. The basic premise of his earlier book was that the most successful organisations on the planet are vision-guided and values-driven, and the results from his team mapping the values of more than 500 companies in 37 countries since 1997 support this view. There are two central topics explored in this book: a whole-system or 'integral' approach to cultural transformation, and values management - the measuring, monitoring and responding to causal indicators of performance (values and behaviours) to adjust the culture of an organisation, so that it is able to sustain high performance and deliver high quality product under all operating conditions. (If you would like to purchase any of the books referenced in this newsletter, please give Sue a ring (02 9566 2157), remind her that you are a ProfiTune client and, in addition to her usual superb service, you will be rewarded with a friendly discount.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thoughts for the Month |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"I'm slowly becoming a convert to the principle that you can't
motivate people to do things, you can only demotivate them. The
primary job of the manager is not to empower but to remove obstacles." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subscribe/Unsubscribe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Armando Camacho
|